NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR [JC], FEB. 7, 2022

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND

February 7, 2022

PETITIONER:

Donna Voetee, Lockhart, Texas 78644;

the grandmother of [JC], a student of Lockhart Independent School District at Clearfork Elementary School.


          Dr. Barbara Sanchez, Dist. 1
“(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

RESPONDENTS:

Lockhart Independent School District

Rebecca Leonard, Principal of Clearfork Elementary School

Teachers and Teacher Assistants of [JC]

School Board Trustees:

          Rene Rayos, Dist. 2

          Tom Guyton, Secretary, at large

          Sam Lockhart, Dist. 3

          Warren Burnett, Vice President, Dist. 4

          Michael Wright, President

          Rebecca Pulliam, member

Mark Estrada, LISD School Board Superintendent

 

FACTS:

1.    On Wednesday, February 2, my grandson was physically violated, emotionally abused, and mercilessly humiliated in front of his peers by school administrators who demanded under color of law that he consent to an unlawful medical intervention.

2.    [JC] was kidnapped from his regular classroom and held against his will, isolated in a room next to the Principal’s office, where he was told he had to stay and do his work unless he consented to the unlawful medical intervention.

3.    [JC] was not allowed to have recess or attend any of his elected classes.

4.    Unless [JC] consents to unlawful medical intervention, he has been told that he must continue to do his work segregated from his classmates.

RESPONDENTS’ VIOLATION OF SUNDRY LAWS

Respondents have acted criminally, in conspiracy against the laws of Texas and the United States of America in denying the rights of [JC].

1.    Facial coverings are a medical intervention. None of the Respondents are medical doctors or have authority to demand performance from [JC].

2.    Respondents are practicing medicine without a license, a statutory violation of Texas law 151.002(a))13) UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF MEDICINE and 164.052(a)(13) IMPERSONATION OR ALLOWING THE IMPERSONATION OF A PHYSICIAN.

3.    Facial covering mandates are not duly bonded by any legislative action, either State or federal, therefore there is NO LAW that orders wearing of masks.

4.    As there is no bonded law that gives Respondents authority to administer pains and penalties for noncompliance of a fictional demand, Respondents are therefore acting under COLOR OF LAW, “official oppression,” a violation of Texas Penal Code 39.03, and a Class A misdemeanor, with possible felony counts because a minor child is the victim.

5.    Denying rights under COLOR OF LAW is also a federal violation of Title 18 United States Code 242.

6.    Respondents do not possess an Order of Quarantine against [JC]; therefore, he is entitled to full and equal access of all educational services provided by Lockhart Independent School District.

7.    [JC] exercised his God-given, unalienable rights of Self-preservation and Self-defense to resist the arbitrary, unlawful demands of Respondents to endanger his own health by reduction of oxygen and concomitant increase of carbon dioxide; therefore, Respondents are in violation of DUE PROCESS laws.

8.    Respondents violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, an unlawful and seditious assault on the United States Constitution because they demanded [JC] to conform with religious mandates of Sharia law, or “Niqab” facial coverings that are demanded under Talibanist legalism.

9.    Forcing [JC] to perform in order to receive services constitutes involuntary servitude, i.e., SLAVERY, a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.  

10.        [JC] is a victim of HUMAN TRAFFICKING because Respondents are gaining financially by denying his rights. 

a.    Governor Greg Abbott issued Executive Order GA-36 on May 18, 2021, relating to the prohibition of governmental entities and officials from mandating face coverings or restricting activities in relation to Covid 19. 

b.    LISD continues to violate this order, even under threat of lawsuits from the State of Texas and under protest of many parents and citizens of Lockhart.

c.     Since LISD stands to gain financially under the Biden administration’s Project SAFE (Supporting America’s Families and Educators), which reimburses state fines and penalties with federal funds, children are being used as pawns in a political gambit that likely is also violation of Racketeering laws under RICO.

d.    President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 13818 on Dec. 21, 2017, declaring a national emergency because of serious human rights violations that constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. 

 

This Executive Order applies to

(1)   corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets…

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term "person" means an individual or entity;

(b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

 

(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.”

REMEDY AND DEMANDS

Such heinous violations of [JC]'s unalienable rights are not to be taken lightly. The LISD school board trustees and superintendent are elected officials who have taken an OATH to protect their constituents.  Violation of this oath is PERJURY. 

I demand that Respondents immediately resign their offices and let the People replace them with conscientious and honorable administrators who will faithfully protect all children according to the law.

I demand that Respondents immediately cease and desist all unlawful actions against [JC]. 

I demand that the property and interests in property, i.e., state and federal grants and monies, of Lockhart Independent School District and Respondents be  blocked in accordance with the intent Executive Order 13818.

 

Sincerely,

Donna Voetee

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Diagnosis of Illiteracy

"not entitled"

How Many Fingers, Winston: Why I Hate Public Education